Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Practical reasoning as presumptive argumentation using action based alternating transition systems
In this paper we describe an approach to practical reasoning, reasoning about what it is best for a particular agent to do in a given situation, based on presumptive justifications of action through the instantiation of an argument scheme, which is then subject to examination through a series of critical questions. We identify three particular aspects of practical reasoning which distinguish it...
متن کاملRepresenting Abductive Practical Reasoning as an Action-Based Alternating Transition System
In this report we present an approach to abductive reasoning by examining it in the context of an argumentation scheme for practical reasoning. We present a particular scheme, based on one for practical reasoning, that can be used to reason abductively about how an agent might have acted to find itself in a particular sceanrio, and its motivations for doing so. We provide a formal representatio...
متن کاملArgumentation-based Normative Practical Reasoning
Reasoning about what is best for an agent to do in a particular situation is a challenging task. What makes it even more challenging in a dynamic environment is the existence of norms that aim to regulate a self-interested agent’s behaviour. Practical reasoning is reasoning about what to do in a given situation, particularly in the presence of conflicts between the agent’s practical attitude su...
متن کاملAction-Based Alternating Transition Systems for Arguments about Action
This paper presents a formalism to describe practical reasoning in terms of an Action-based Alternating Transition System (AATS). The starting point is a previously specified account of practical reasoning that treats reasoning about what action should be chosen as presumptive argumentation using argument schemes and associated critical questions. This paper describes how this account can be ex...
متن کاملDecision Support through Argumentation-Based Practical Reasoning
This extended research abstract describes an argumentation-based approach to modelling articulated decision making contexts. The approach encompasses a variety of argument and attack schemes aimed at representing basic knowledge and reasoning patterns for decision support.
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Artificial Intelligence
سال: 2007
ISSN: 0004-3702
DOI: 10.1016/j.artint.2007.04.009